Interested in learning how to make a Wikipedia page? The primary necessity for the topic is to have significance. The article's subject should either have it or be made significant. The guidelines in this article will help you understand the key components required for creating a Wikipedia page and how to organize them.
Enhance, Protect, and Perfect your Wiki presence.Transform your digital footprint with our Wiki prowess! Edit Smarter, Edit Better with WikiEditor
To establish a Wikipedia page, the topic at hand must predominantly demonstrate notability.
Certainly! Please provide the text that you would like me to reword. Substantial Coverage: The topic of the article should have garnered considerable focus from trustworthy sources. “Significant coverage” refers to the source discussing the topic thoroughly and directly; simply alluding to it once or twice in a piece is insufficient.
Of course! Please provide the text you would like me to reword. Trustworthy References: The citations on Wikipedia need to be trustworthy (though the reliability of Wikipedia itself is a separate issue). This indicates that they are outside sources acknowledged for their reliability and verification of facts. This could involve newspapers, magazines, scholarly journals, printed materials, and numerous trustworthy sources.
Notability needs to be established first, as re-creating an article post-deletion due to lack of notability demands greater effort than what might have been adequate initially
Creating a new Wikipedia entry is a great way to share information worldwide. However, multiple essential steps must be taken before constructing the page. Start by understanding Wikipedia’s strict guidelines to ensure that your new page meets their standards. Here is a comprehensive guide on how to create a Wikipedia page,
1. Prior to beginning, take a moment to understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Highlight Wikipedia's guidelines regarding conflicts of interest, notability, and upholding a neutral viewpoint. This will assist you in grasping which types of content are permitted and how to tackle writing your piece.
2. Just registered users are able to generate new pages. Register for a Wikipedia account by submitting a valid email address along with a username.
3. Before beginning a new page, take some time to practice so you can get used to it. We recommend that you alter one or two existing articles to get used to the process. Avoid significant alterations; simply enhance a handful of pages slightly.
4. Wikipedia mandates that any information included on its pages must be confirmable through trustworthy and autonomous sources. Performing this segment effectively is crucial. You ought to gather references from books, journals, newspapers, or reliable online sources. Individual blogs, press releases, or any type of self-published content are viewed as untrustworthy. Click here for more information.
5. Compose the Article in Your User Sandbox
6. Avoid simply composing an article and publishing it immediately. Your user account offers a 'sandbox' for crafting your article.
7. You may start writing at this moment. Create a well-researched, balanced article in your workspace. Wikipedia articles should be written in an encyclopedic style, including appropriate section headings, an introductory part summarizing the topic, detailed body sections expanding on the subject, and a references section acknowledging the sources used. Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's Manual of Style to understand this concept.
8. An article can go live once your account has completed multiple edits. Nevertheless, Wikipedia generally favors the submission of new articles for evaluation. To achieve this, finish the procedure for Articles for Creation. This stage involves moving the content from your sandbox to the draft namespace, where experienced editors will evaluate it.
After you submit your draft for review, Wikipedia’s volunteer editors will evaluate it. They might support it, suggest changes, or they could entirely dismiss it. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is a collaborative project reliant on contributions from many editors, so your willingness to engage and work together will promote a smoother experience
Alongside the general notability standards, there are specific criteria for different subjects concerning notability. For example, to be regarded as important, artists or bands usually must have put out at least one album through a reputable record label or garnered substantial attention from various trustworthy independent channels
In Wiki terminology, biographies of individuals who are alive are referred to as BLPs. They represent a unique category for new Wikipedia entries. To have a Wikipedia entry created for living individuals, they must follow the "BLP guidelines."
1. About Privacy: Wikipedia prioritizes privacy matters in the biographies of living individuals (BLP). Although this serves as a broad guideline for all Wikipedia entries, it is particularly stressed for BLPs because of the risk of actual harm.
2. BLPs face distinct constraints that may not impact others, including a stricter obligation to steer clear of contentious information that is either unsourced or inadequately sourced. Editors prioritize upholding exceptional quality standards for BLP
A dispute arises on Wikipedia. On one hand, numerous organizations seek the prestige linked to having a Wikipedia page dedicated to them. On the other hand, many Wikipedia editors simply possess a contempt for corporations and will look for any reason to eliminate or downplay articles about businesses regardless of their industry.
Businesses connected to crypto seem to be facing a notably difficult period. Editors often gets inquiries to create pages for cryptocurrency companies; however, references from most cryptocurrency industry publications alone are inadequate to demonstrate notability.
Financial services companies constitute another industry that encounters additional challenges, albeit not nearly as many as gambling companies
A Washington Post article about a subject is usually considered a good reference when creating a Wikipedia page, whereas a press release about the same subject is not considered notable.
Examples of sources Wikipedia generally deems unreliable include:
• Tabloid newspapers
• Articles by contributors rather than staff writers
• Fan sites like Fandom.com
• Content owned or controlled by the subject
• Press releases
• State-controlled media (propaganda)
• Quora
• Reddit conversations
• Breitbart.com
• Sputnik News
• The Onion
• Answers.com
We frequently receive inquiries about the reliability of press releases. Isn’t the topic of an article the main source, making it more trustworthy? A press release is not considered significant for citation in a Wikipedia article since the topic of the article might influence the press release. A press release or related material that the person can manage is regarded as a “primary source.”
A press release is fundamentally a form of self-advocacy. Anyone can obtain a press release for under $100. This is the reason a press release is classified as “owned” content, while a reference on Wikipedia is regarded as “earned” content